Jobs

Revised Day One when we felt we had given too many “jobs” to kids: putting away bag + placing shoes + making nametag + coloring attendance picture was enough for the younger kids. Forget about a pretest.

For the older kids, we trod warily… And they filled out pretest page after pretest page for… how long? At least 30 minutes, probably 45. By this time, Emily and I had bought our watches but my sense of time and ability to keep straight my trampolining thoughts was somewhat compromised.

On Day Two, we scaled back. We divided up curriculum setup responsibilities deliberately; we accepted the assistance of program helpers; we rotated in teachers for end-of-the-day meeting leading; we even excused little old me for the older kids’ arrival + snack + meeting period so that I could address the writing of our newsletters. Some kids announced they were done with mural painting and asked to play. “You have one more job,” one of us would say, and challenge them to paint a figure or hieroglyph they’d never taken on before, or dab their hieroglyphic carved soap bar with brown paint. Where is the limit between order and imposition? Should we be giving them these jobs? Like the question of whether to call this school, is “job” the correct appelation?

On Day Three, I hope we’ll continue finding our rhythm. We learned all of the children’s names. The newsletter templates are written. The system for recording kids’ quotes is established. And my five-year hiatus from early childhood teaching has been broken… and I’m getting broken in… and my broken body is coming back, again, like the persistent zombie from many a horror film.

I’ve got a job to do.

Sense and sensorability

Unsuspectingly, got hit by a hurricane. Then, uber-prepared, the hurricane never came — more like impossibly clear skies sprinkled by flash lightning storms.

Welcome to the first day of school. (“It’s not school!” six-year-old Vihan impatiently informed me this morning. “You’re right,” I agreed hastily, worrying that the school moniker would conjure negative predispositions. “What do you think we should call it?” “The Expanding Minds Program,” he replied, straight-faced. That… happens to be the exact name of the program. “All right,” I consented. While it may not be “school,” Vihan just schooled me.)

Today was about students and teachers getting a sense of our space and each other — characteristics, limits, resources, values. It was also chockful of sensory experiences: the chaos of 15 five- to seven-year-olds; the eerie silence of 9 seven- to nine-year-olds; sticky fingers from floam play and glue shmearing; the squishiness of mashing flower petal pulp and sliding barefoot on poster paint; tongue-twisting names (mine for them, Adit and Sidanthika for me); limb-constraining contexts (sitting on the carpet for meeting isn’t easy for anybody); light shifts, from the darkness of our simulated cave to the brightness of our clear-windowed/chandelier-rocking/riotously colorful decor; auditory challenges (can you hear the clap/chimes above the din? can you detect the subtle th embezzled in the t of Adit?); et cetera, et cetera, et cetera…*

When it comes to sense-making, rolling up your sleeves and getting hands-on is arguably the way to go. In terms of my own cultural education, that… happens to be the exact nature of the program. No better way to learn about a people’s particularities and all people’s similarities than being there.

How will our sense of it all shift over time, and what new capacities will we develop by engaging our bodies, ourselves in contexts of novelty and risk?
Continue reading

Conservation

As my personal energy waned — lost to sleep deprivation, summoned by clay sculpting, expended via sightseeing, drained through armpits, hands, and feet, tapped by mobile phone manipulating*, stolen by rupee and calorie counting, challenged by curriculum planning, finished by total classroom overhaul and communication through several layers of go-betweens — I observed our interpersonal energy wax.

I could read their moods better, and they could read mine. Our trust was growing. Our walls were tumbling. Mine, Emily’s, Malika’s, Monali’s, Sundar’s (our driver for today, who waited for us patiently as we melted into the masses and reappeared 45 minutes later), Vasundhara’s, Shiv’s (who followed us to our apartment after a long day’s work and showed us how to turn on the hot plate, enabling the transformation of dangerous vegetables into nutrition-sustaining supper). It might be audacious to say, but maybe even India’s.

Today, Emily’s batteries literally ran out and recharged. We discovered that the A/C couldn’t run last night because I’d flipped the wall switch that cut off its power. We caffeinated three times — morning, noon, and night — to sustain our work-play-work lifestyle. We cooled it down with domestic gin & tonic and all-American Gilmore Girls. We also charmed Sunayha and Hash, the proprietor and little rascal of a small arts center, respectively. There was the plump woman in the sari who kept turning around to gaze at us and chuckle as we twisted our way toward the shrine. A couple in the elevator remarked how sweet it was that we thanked the operator in Hindi while they uttered “thank you.”

“The law of conservation of energy is a law of physics. It states that the total amount of energy in a system remains constant over time (is said to be conserved over time). A consequence of this law is that energy can neither be created nor destroyed: it can only be transformed from one state to another. The only thing that can happen to energy in a system is that it can change form” (Conservation of energy).

In the land that long ago spiritualized this law (reincarnation by another name), I’m living its wisdom. You get out what you put in.
Continue reading