Tribeca Film Institute: Profile of a NAMLE organizational member

reposted from http://namle.net/2014/04/25/org-member-profile-tribeca-film-institute/

by Laurel J. Felt | April 25, 2014

 

Tribeca Film Institute, an affiliate of the well-known Tribeca Film Festival, offers cutting-edge, socially conscious educational opportunities for youth across New York City. Tribeca Education and Engagement Coordinator Flonia Telegrafi recently took the time to discuss with me Tribeca’s educational impacts, offerings, and plans for the future.

IMPACTS
Founded in the wake of September 11, 2001, Tribeca aims to support community-building by sharing socially relevant stories, empowering storytellers, and working with youth. Its extensive and process-based education department, staffed by individuals who either have taught or still are teaching, outreaches year-round to educators and students. Collectively, Tribeca’s five education programs aspire to “help young people gain the media skills necessary to be productive global citizens and creative individuals.”.

Explained Telegrafi, “The largest program we have is called Tribeca Teaches. We’re in 30 K-12 schools all throughout the five boroughs, and we send a teaching artist into these schools for a year-long residency. They work with students both in-class or after-school (depending on the specific residency) to make films.” In so doing, Tribeca Teaches seeks to “help children with expression tools, self-discovery, bring young people together whether they’re classmates or peers in a school, and really explore storytelling as a tool for self-expression.”

Last year, one of Tribeca Teaches’ participating schools was the East River Academy, an educational program serving incarcerated students aged 16-21 on Rikers Island. Thanks to a grant provided by New York’s Hive Learning Network, Tribeca is currently wrapping up its second year on Rikers Island at the Rose M. Singer Center, the only all-female facility on the island.

Telegrafi herself teaches Rikers’s 40 participants per year, and uniquely designed the curriculum to accommodate the contextual constraints of a jail. For example, because the students enter and leave Telegrafi’s tutelage as they enter and leave the facility, “it’s really important to scaffold the lesson. If a student is in the classroom for only two sessions, they can complete something,” said Telegrafi.

This “something” might be finishing a writing prompt, creating a spoken word poem, or recording their voice. Because surveillance equipment — which includes video cameras — is not permitted on Rikers, students cannot capture their own footage. But this doesn’t prevent their filmmaking.

“We instituted an exchange with one of our Tribeca Teaches classroom on the outside, the Young Women’s Leadership School in Astoria,” explained Telegrafi. First, she asked her Rikers students to consider “what their version of the world would look like if they had all the power.” Next, they wrote poems visualizing this world and recorded their own recitations via Garage Band. Then Astoria students received these recordings along with a shot list and filmed images around the neighborhood and city that, they believed, respected their partners’ vision. Finally, Rikers students took the footage and edited together their own videos.

“What we discovered is that art is an amazing tool to increase self-esteem,” enthused Telegrafi. “Doing and reinforcing self-esteem through art-making, where there’s lots of do-over and that’s okay, I feel like it drives home the fact that there is no right and wrong, you can do it over and that’s okay… It’s not about black-and white or right and wrong, you can keep growing and learning just by doing and redoing. Art and filmmaking reinforces that… And the fact that the young women are using MacBooks and don’t have to share, they’re working on their own computer, and using FinalCut, a professional editing tool, and getting over the frustration to get good at it, and not pushing the computer away…” Telegrafi trailed off. Obviously, the impacts of this engagement are significant. Telegrafi also points to “the validating aspect of being able to share their work and their words with the young women outside, having an actual audience.”

Sharing with audiences occurs both on and off the island. At Rikers, “as soon as they [the students] finish something, even if it’s a rough cut, we invite people in to take a look. It shows that the women are willing to share, open to feedback, and are just proud of their work.”

Back on the mainland, Tribeca Teaches culminates with an annual screening of the students’ work, which is integrated within the Tribeca Film Festival. Held just a few days ago (April 25) at the 1000-seat Tribeca Performing Arts Center, this celebratory event enabled students, families, teachers and members of the public to appreciate participating youths’ creativity and perspectives. “We actually rent buses for each school so they come in busloads,” said Telegrafi. “We also reserve seats for students who didn’t partake in the program.” Read more about the partnership at Rikers, and the experience of one liberated inmate as she witnessed her film’s debut in The New York Times.

OFFERINGS
The Tribeca Youth Screening Series pursues media literacy through more “traditional” channels, via screening socially relevant films and discussing these films’ implications. Notably, educators from around the world can access Tribeca’s original curricula and Educators’ Guides.

Rather than a foray into art-making, like Tribeca Teaches, this program is “seen more as an intellectual exercise, building students’ capacity to examine, deconstruct, analytically discuss.” What do they discuss? “Issues, stereotypes, different social justice aspects,” listed Telegrafi. “In a year’s worth of schooling, where students are exposed to math, science, social studies, we think it’s important that they also understand that they have a voice and can make educated decisions.”

Ten diverse schools situated across New York City participate in the Tribeca Youth Screening Series. Each fall and spring, these students explore four films that look at a particular theme. Said Telegrafi, “We want to always make sure that the themes we select and the films we screen resonate with students’ identities and backgrounds. We’re always thinking in terms of points of access.” An understanding of participating students’ origins, e.g., where some students have immigrated and where they currently reside, informs the curation process. This past fall of 2013, Tribeca Youth Screening Series investigated “food justice”; this spring, the theme was “home,” explored via the films Persepolis,Do the Right ThingHerman’s House, and Inocente.

Youths from every school attend the four film screenings together, which provides a special engagement opportunity for members of various communities who meet rarely, if ever. For example, schools in the Bronx and Brooklyn participate in this series, as well as three English Language Learner institutions respectively located in Queens, Chinatown and Union Square. As soon as the lights go up after each film, associated directors, producers, or actors welcome questions from the student audience. According to Telegrafi, this provides “…a forum where they can ask questions and are not afraid to make a point. So it’s important in terms of opening people’s minds to different perspectives and realities, and taking that back to their homes, communities, and classrooms.”

Before and after each screening, Tribeca equips teaching artists with original curricula and sends them to every participating school in order to facilitate additional in-class discussions — 8 sessions in all. In terms of the curricula, Telegrafi explained, “We’re looking to address the issues that are raised in the films through different hands-on, student-driven activities… [Educators’ Guides] include activities around keywords and actual discussion prompts, and have a thru-line and make sense from pre to post.”

This program also ends with a final celebration. Because Inocente examined art — specifically, art’s role in empowering a 15-year-old, homeless, undocumented immigrant, Tribeca invited professional muralists to wrap up the spring series by assisting students in their own mural-making. Like the film’s protagonist, Tribeca’s “graduates” appropriated color and form to tell stories, make statements, and re-dedicate themselves to their dreams.

“The overall goal is to ensure that young people are open and receptive to seeing different life experiences acted out on film,” Telegrafi elucidated. “One of our main goals is to introduce the young people who participate to different cultures so that we leave our daily life for a second and observe and try to understand how somebody else is living.

“We hope that, not only are they engaging in conversations in the classroom and are able to analyze a film by breaking down the different issues and themes that affect our lives, but that they’re open to debate, friendly debate, conversation. Hopefully watching one of these films will change their mind or their perspective on an issue. Maybe they’ll leave more open-minded and see somebody else’s point of view.”

Also of note to local media educators is Tribeca’s Blueprint For The Moving Image. This program consists of three, large-scale professional development sessions offered each spring, various skill-building workshops on Saturday’s, and the option to receive teaching artists who will offer classroom-based instruction in whichever areas the teachers have expressed interest over a three-day residency period.

Articulated Telegrafi, “Our purpose is to not only to provide these workshops where they’re exposed to new tools, technologies, ways of designing a lesson or approaching a topic through media, but [to offer] a place where media teachers across the city can get together and meet each other and be part of a learning professional network of their peers.”

PLANS FOR THE FUTURE
“We’re going to continue doing the work that we do,” said Telegrafi. That work entails “…constantly assessing, checking in with folks. We’re trying to listen to folks and their needs and have that inform our process. But definitely [we plan on] exposing more young people to filmmaking, art-making, [and we will be] building platforms for our students’ work, getting our Rikers students’ work out, and inspiring young people across the city to the possibilities of art and having their voice heard and expressing themselves.”

Tribeca Film Institute’s Director of Education Vee Bravo also shared his big picture visions. “In the future we imagine an educational environment where media literacy programs reach multi-generational students through partnerships among schools and institutions such as prisons, hospitals, environmental and social justice groups. This means redefining the classroom into a lab where the make-up of students includes young people, teachers, parents and professional artists collaborating on meaningful art projects.”

NAMLE salutes the Tribeca Film Institute!

Center for Media Literacy: Profile of a NAMLE organizational member

re-posted from http://namle.net/2014/03/24/org-member-profile-center-for-media-literacy/

By Laurel J. Felt | March 24, 2014

 

The Center for Media Literacy (CML) occupies a cornerstone in our community. CML President and CEO Tessa Jolls recently took the time to discuss with me CML’s impacts, offerings, and plans for the future.

IMPACTS

Since 1989, when media literacy pioneer Elizabeth Thoman established CML, this organization has served as a global resource for media literacy education. CML has worked with overseas partners in such far-flung nations as Peru, South Korea, and Bosnia/Herzegovina, while simultaneously continuing to produce original curricula that meet the United States’s diverse education standards.

It’s impossible for Jolls to quantify how many individuals from around the world have logged onto medialit.org over the past 20+ years. “Our website has always been really high in the Google rankings,” Jolls admitted. “I wouldn’t be surprised if our reach is better described in the millions rather than the thousands…” She estimates that CML’s MediaLit Moments, which are free downloadable classroom activities designed to promote discussion, reach thousands of people per month.

Recently, CML published Voices of Media Literacy: International Pioneers Speak, a series of interviews with 20 trailblazers of media literacy. Jolls recognizes this work as a real contribution due to the lack of any first-person information previously available. “We did that project to really capture the points of view of these pioneers —and since we’ve done it, two have already passed away. It was a real privilege to be able to talk with people who helped form the field.”

For any critical consumers of media literacy pedagogy, and especially for advocates whose petitions would benefit from persuasive evidence of media literacy’s return on investment, CML’s assessment of media literacy’s value is phenomenally useful.

Beyond Blame has been selected by the California Department of Education as a high quality curriculum for in-class and after school programs, and is now included in the California Healthy Kids Resource Library and the Resource Library of the California After School Resource Center. Smoke Detectors! meets Common Core Standards for Language Arts for both middle school and high school, as well as California State Health Standards and National Technology Standards.

Jolls explained, “We’ve now evaluated our methodology in a longitudinal study and so we have research that really shows the effectiveness of using media literacy as an educational strategy.” Jolls and co-investigator Kathryn Fingar (2013) found that CML’s curriculum Beyond Blame: Challenging Violence in the Media “…is associated with improved knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors related to media use and aggression” (p. 1).

In a separate study that also looked at 2007-2008 Beyond Blame data, UCLA researchers Webb and Martin (2012) found, “compared with controls, students in both intervention groups were more likely to agree that media violence may cause aggression, fear, desensitization and an appetite for more media violence at the post-test. Students in the trained group were also more likely than controls to understand the five core concepts/key questions of media literacy post-intervention” (p. 430).

Media literacy efforts must be consistent, replicable, and scalable, Jolls emphasized. “We believe that it’s imperative, really, for the media literacy field […] to take the scientific approach.”

OFFERINGS

Explained Jolls, “We have developed a consistent framework and materials that can be applied to any content area or academic subject; so our work, we believe, is very in tune with the demands for education today. We really have developed a methodology that lends itself to anytime, anywhere learning.” To realize that goal of supporting anytime/anywhere learning, CML offers many materials for free online, including Connections, its monthly newsletter, and critical literacy curriculum Teaching Democracy: A Media Literacy Approach.

CML’s online store also sells over 20 resources for classroom use and professional development. This includes CML’s new curriculum, A Recipe for Action: Deconstructing Food Advertising. Around late March, Jolls estimates, CML also will release Smoke Detectors!. This timely curriculum addresses modern tobacco cessation using the CML framework — Questions/TIPS — and the Empowerment Spiral of Awareness, Analysis, Reflection, Action. Observed Jolls, “It seems that, especially with the introduction of e-cigarettes, that tobacco cessation has become of concern to people again, and so we’ve tried to include some of the media around e-cigarettes in the curriculum. I think that that would be of interest to people because most curricula don’t address that.”

PLANS FOR THE FUTURE

While CML has supported a few recent events — notably, the National Telemedia Council’s 60th anniversary and a March 4 screening & discussion of This Is Media: Eyes Wide Shut at California State University-Northridge — its emphasis is on “providing leadership, research and development that can really help teachers to teach media literacy.”

Jolls believes that CML, and the pursuit of media literacy, will remain relevant, even as technological and social changes continue to shift the way we work, learn, and live. Reflected Jolls, “It’s not so much about the technology, it’s about critical thinking, and having the process skills, whether you’re producing or consuming. So that’s what we’ve been trying to focus on — what’s timeless, what’s a systematic way of looking at media, and how media operate as a system.”

NAMLE salutes the Center for Media Literacy!

Circles: Healing Through Restorative Justice

re-posted from http://www.kcet.org/socal/departures/restorative-justice/restorative-justice-circles.html

By  | March 5, 2014

This is part of a series examining Restorative Justice in schools and communities, produced in partnership with the California Endowment.

 
 
circles02
“Who or what inspires you to be your best self?”

This is hardly the question that most Angelenos would ask at 9:30 in the morning on a gray, rainy Saturday. But for the 80+ adults and youth who gathered on March 2 at Mendez Learning Center in Boyle Heights, this introspective query kicked off “Circles,” a rich, daylong exploration of Restorative Justice.

Restorative Justice (RJ) seeks to cultivate both peacemaking and healing by facilitating meaningful dialogue. Practiced through conversation circles, whose norms include “listen with respect” and “speak from the heart,” RJ provides contexts for sharing feelings and perspectives related to community issues and conflicts. Individuals directly engaged in altercations, as well as bystanders and other community members, gather to discuss inciting incidents, understandings, preferences, past experiences, ideas, and advice.

According to one Circles participant, a senior at Roosevelt High School in Boyle Heights, RJ works. He and a peer had a falling out this past fall — he had criticized the peer and then they began fighting. Both were invited to a RJ circle to work it out. The circle, populated by fellow students and facilitated by a trained RJ counselor, gave the two young men a space to air their grievances and, importantly, get to know each other. In Aceves’s opinion, this was critical. Now the former combatants are good friends, hanging out together practically every weekend.

While this rosy outcome isn’t typical, RJ increases the likelihood of such a relational development. Compared to traditional responses, like turning a blind eye, assigning short-term mediation, or sentencing wrong-doers with detention, suspension, or expulsion, RJ’s odds of building interpersonal bridges is infinitely superior.

Traditional justice systems use punishment, such as zero-tolerance, to deter students from breaking rules, whereas RJ assumes that strong relationships and community investment function as deterrence. Traditional justice systems are reactive and atomistic, meting out consequences to perpetrators of discrete, forbidden acts — for instance, suspending the student who threw the first punch. But RJ is proactive and collectivistic, engaging a network of students before and during negotiations of conflict. RJ is also restorative, aiming to support participants in healing, problem-solving, and making amends.

 

 

Omar Ramirez, a visual artist with the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and who served as a Circles small group leader, frames RJ as a means to shut down the “school to prison pipeline.” RJ might help to do this in several ways.

Because RJ is a dialogic alternative to suspension and expulsion, it breaks the cycle of disproportionately meting out punitive disciplinary consequences to students with disabilities and students of color. This stops the implicit messaging that these students are unwelcome in school, and helps to keep them off the streets. According to The California Conference for Equality and Justice, a suspension at any point during high school makes a student three times more likely to drop out than a peer who has never been suspended.

Additionally, it’s possible that RJ participants who acquire tools for communicating and managing emotions will find it easier to resist criminal activity. Participating in RJ also might help youths to engage in perspective-taking and practice empathy, both of which boost negatively predict bullying and boost students’ social and emotional competence. This is critical, since researchers from Sonoma State University have contended that “deficits in emotional competence skills appear to leave young people ill-equipped to cope effectively with interpersonal challenges.” 1

Due to RJ’s capacity to both support students’ social-emotional health and contribute to school climate change, members of the Building Healthy Communities – Boyle Heights (BHC-BH) collaborative have championed its practice. Building Healthy Communities is an effort of The California Endowment to support 14 communities’ holistic health; Boyle Heights, as well as Long Beach and South Los Angeles, are among these communities. Forty non-profits and community-based organizations comprise the BHC-BH collaborative. Its mission, according to BHC-BH’s campaign literature, is to “meet with resident and youth leaders to establish efforts that will improve the health narrative of Boyle Heights.”

Pilot RJ programs launched in Long Beach and at Boyle Heights’s Roosevelt High School this 2013-2014 academic year. But to scale up RJ and implement it in every school in Boyle Heights (not to mention every Los Angeles Unified School District institution), funding is necessary — specifically, funding to support the salary of each school’s full-time RJ counselor.

In this context of state-wide budget deficits, locating any money at all requires creative activism. BHC-BH has identified as its RJ funding solution the Local Control Funding Formula(LCFF). Introduced in California’s 2013-2014 budget, the LCFF provides grants for schools that serve foster youth, English Language Learners, and/or youths eligible to receive a free or reduced-price meal. This describes many of Boyle Heights’ students.

 

 

Las Fotos Project presented the Circles workshop, in partnership with several community-based organizations: The Greenlining Institute, the California Conference for Equality and Justice, InnerCity Struggle, Khmer Girls in Action, Violence Prevention Coalition, and Alliance for California Traditional Arts. 2 Together, they defined the workshop’s objectives, which included raising attendees’ awareness of the BCH-BH, educating them about LCFF, and inviting them to urge officials to direct local LCFF funds towards RJ. According to Eric Ibarra, founder of Las Fotos Project, the March 2 workshop also was inspired by his pride in his students’ photo essays.

Ibarra’s Las Fotos Project seeks to empower Latina youth through photography, mentorship, and self-expression. Whereas five of Ibarra’s students last year premiered their photo essays online, this year Ibarra yearned to share his students’ projects with live audiences as well. Moreover, since this year’s photo essays examined RJ, Ibarra wanted audiences to explore RJ hands-on, learn about how RJ can be funded locally, and access pathways to activism.

That’s precisely what the Circles workshop offered. After attendees shared who or what inspired them to be their best selves, they watched a photo essay created by Las Fotos Project participant Lorena Arroyo. A 17-year-old Roosevelt High School student, Arroyo documented cheerleader Gaby’s explorations of RJ within her squad. Following the photo essay presentation, Arroyo proudly bowed to Circles attendees’ thunderous applause. Four more of these media projects, highlighting the respective RJ journeys of two students, a parent, and a school staff member, will be forthcoming from Las Fotos Project participants.

Explained Ibarra, Circles represents “the efforts of a lot of really passionate people … We believe in the importance of collaboration and sharing resources to work together for a common cause.”

Rich in geographic, ethnic, and occupational diversity, Circles attendees seemed to share that collaborative ethos. For example, Circle #3, facilitated by Ramirez, included three high school students, a community organizer, a nun, a PhD candidate [myself], a high school teacher, and an editor [of KCET Departures], all of whom eagerly embraced RJ’s community spirit. Establishing our own dialogic circle gave us a space to learn about RJ and each other. We shared and, more importantly, deeply listened to personal stories about a Native American grandmother, a growing daughter, an insensitive coworker, a resilient student, and a passion for ’80s fashion. We also discussed RJ definitions and how to conduct circles for addressing teacher-student conflicts.

To close the workshop, each Circle group practiced and promoted RJ through the use of a different art form, e.g., collage, journaling, breakdancing. Articulated members of the spoken word circle, “I am a beautiful dreamer, I am a strong fighter.” Members of the songwriting circle entitled their tune, “We Want to Restore Justice.” Together they sang the refrain, “This is ours/People power.”

In the view of 20-year-old Anaheim community organizer Carlos Becerra, the implications of this people power can be revolutionary. Stated Becerra, “Restorative Justice, when implemented in our global community, has the potential to create world wide peace and prosperity.”

 

21st Century Teaching Practices

Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012

Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012

Pellegrino, J.W. & Hilton, M.L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

After conducting extensive interdisciplinary research on behalf of The National Research Council, several committees of experts in education, psychology, evaluation, sociology, physics, astronomy, geology, learning sciences, and cognitive science recommended the following 21st century teaching practices:

o Using multiple and varied representations of concepts and tasks, such as diagrams, numerical and mathematical representations, and simulations, combined with activities and guidance that support mapping across the varied representations.

o Encouraging elaboration, questioning, and explanation—for example, prompting students who are reading a history text to think about the author’s intent and/or to explain specific information and arguments as they read—either silently to themselves or to others.

o Engaging learners in challenging tasks, while also support- ing them with guidance, feedback, and encouragement to reflect on their own learning processes and the status of their understanding.

o Teaching with examples and cases, such as modeling step-by- step how students can carry out a procedure to solve a problem and using sets of worked examples.

o Priming student motivation by connecting topics to students’ personal lives and interests, engaging students in collaborative problem solving, and drawing attention to the knowledge and skills students are developing, rather than grades or scores.

o Using formative assessment to: (a) make learning goals clear to students; (b) continuously monitor, provide feedback, and respond to students’ learning progress; and (c) involve students in self- and peer assessment.

SOURCE: Pellegrino & Hilton, 2012, pp. 9-10.