Nigh

Ethel Rich, Marci Katz, and Ruth Marcus | January 1962

Ethel Rich, Marcy Katz, and Ruth Marcus | January 1962

“I’ve had a good life,” said my grandmother last week, comforting her 70-year-old niece who wasn’t ready to let her go.

Gramma Ruth, aged 91 and a half, hasn’t yet seen the last of her good life. But the end is nigh.

I’ve written extensively about my incredible grandmother, and the events that both shaped her life and describe this century’s pursuit and attainment of the American Dream. But for old time’s sake, let’s give it another whirl. Ruth’s story goes something like this…

My gramma was born in 1922 to Yiddish-speaking, Russian Jewish immigrants on Chicago’s West Side. Harry Feldman, Ruth’s father, was a barber who dreamed of real estate and slowly acquired some; Sarah Rich, Ruth’s mother, ran a luncheonette and then a delicatessan while working weekends as their apartment building’s janitor. Ruth attended Austin High School during the Depression, when teachers were “paid” by I.O.U. and Ruth’s most valuable class, taught by her most dedicated teacher, trained girls in shorthand and typing. An Honors graduate (whatever that meant, Gramma would say, since the academic regime was hardly rigorous), she began studying at a junior college. Unbeknownst to Ruth, her future husband Ray Marcus also earned high marks at Crain Technical School and enrolled in Wright Junior College. But both Ruth and Ray were forced to abandon their studies after less than a year due to the punctuated maladies of family members. For Ruth, her mother slipped on a patch of ice and broke her wrist, leaving her incapable of operating the meat slicer at the deli. For Ray, his older brother Art developed appendicitis and could not sell his shipment of Sheffield-Bronze paint door-to-door throughout the Midwest. Both families needed someone to fill in; both Ruth and Ray answered the call. And when each respective family member recovered, neither Ruth nor Ray returned to school. Rather, they continued to contribute to their family’s financial wellbeing. The two met when a mutual friend brought the lonely young paint salesman into the South Water Street deli owned by Ruth’s family.

Twenty-one-year-old Ruth married 22-year-old Ray at the dawn of World War II. He was only the second boy Ruth had ever kissed. They had been going together for about a year and enjoyed each other’s company. Had the times been different, perhaps this relationship would have been nothing more than a fling. But the times decreed that Ray was to be Ruth’s last boyfriend. Ray enlisted with the army and, despite eyesight so poor that he should have been designated 4F, Ray was accepted into the military fold. Wedding a G.I. before he shipped out overseas was framed as a girl’s patriotic duty – to refuse was considered both cruel and un-American. Still, Ruth initially resisted; unwed, Ray attended boot camp in the deep South. Then he returned to Chicago for a 15-day furlough before his dispatch to Europe, and he petitioned for Ruth’s hand repeatedly. Even Ray’s mother Gussie got on the telephone and asked Ruth why she would not marry her soldier son. On the furlough’s 12th day, Ruth finally relented. The couple went to City Hall, where a blood test was required prior to legalizing the union. The government employee successfully drew blood from Ray’s vein but could not, despite repeated attempts, find or tap Ruth’s veins. Ray offered to undergo a second draw but worried that whoever checked the blood for syphilis would notice that the two samples were identical. So they went around the corner and drew blood from the dentist on call. It was his blood that sanctioned the wedding of Ruth and Ray at City Hall on September 30, 1943.

This secular ceremony was a sacrilege to Ruth’s über-religious grandfather Jacob, so the next day he dragged the two newlyweds to the kitchen of a local rabbi, who performed the marriage rites “properly.” Ruth and Ray spent some of Ray’s remaining time together. Technically, Ray went away as a “man”; yet virtually, the husband and wife were little more than strangers.

More than two years passed before they saw each other again.

During the war, Ray encountered anti-Semitism, enjoyed camaraderie, survived injury, and witnessed horrors. Ray was assigned as a mechanic since he not only had graduated from a vocational high school but also had serviced his car during his solo treks across the desolate Plains States. (The truth was, there wasn’t much Ray couldn’t do with his hands, a fact that was made clear many years later when he carved a bust of Gramma Ruth out of a random piece of driftwood.) Yet this manual labor didn’t satisfy my ambitious grandfather. Time after time, Ray applied and was denied admission to Officer Candidate School; the only reason that seemed plausible after so many rejections was his religion. So Ray drove a truck that carried replacement parts for military vehicles, including tanks, and spent more time among his contemporaries than he ever had during his youth. Poor eyesight had kept Ray from excelling in neighborhood sports like stickball, while his traveling salesman occupation consigned him to solitude, dining alone in roadside restaurants and flopping down at fleabag motels with shared bathrooms (only on weekends did he allow himself the luxury of his own bathroom).

After some time in service, a large industrial battery fell on Ray’s foot and landed him in the infirmary. Ray recalled that a visiting officer was passing out Purple Hearts “like they were candy” but honor kept Ray from accepting a medal. He hadn’t gotten injured in the line of duty, he reasoned, and so he didn’t deserve distinction. Time passed. Ray bedded down in foxholes, ate pork for the first time, and became a pack-a-day smoker thanks to the cigarettes included in his K-rations. He drove his truck, which he cleverly named Ruthless, anywhere and everywhere his superiors commanded. That is, until D-Day + 1.

Ray didn’t like to talk about the war, and what occurred on the beaches of Normandie is probably part of the reason why. As the history books chronicle, our American boys were mowed down on D-Day; the ocean ran red and bodies – of both corpses and the agonized wounded – littered the shore. Ray was ordered off the enormous ship upon which he and Ruthless were afloat, told to follow the tanks making their way across enemy lines. To do so would mean rolling over the bodies, the thousands of bodies, mutilating their faces, crushing their limbs, entombing the dead, murdering the injured. Ray refused. It was the first and only time he opposed a direct order. He could have been court martialed. During that feverish time, he could even have been executed. But Ray would not, could not follow such a command and luckily, his life was spared. My grandpa didn’t drive off the ship until a lane was cleared and, to be honest, I’m not sure whether he assisted in clearing the bodies for it. I can’t help but think, he probably did assist with that task — who else was there to do it? Dear God…

Meanwhile, back in Chicago, my grandma was growing up in a less harrowing but no less significant way. She worked as a secretary at Sears where, like Ray, she also experienced anti-Semitism but enjoyed camaraderie. Sarah, Ruth’s whip-smart but illiterate mother, got a job at Sears too, filing forms by number. Ruth was lured away by Turner Manufacturing Company, a Jewish-owned business that both paid her more money but expected greater responsibility and provided fewer social outlets. Ruth lived with her parents (her older brother Maury, eight years her senior, had married and moved out) and delivered her wages into a family kitty; only upon her mother’s death did Ruth discover that Sarah had set aside Ruth’s salary. “All those years, she’d been saving it for me,” Ruth had confided, her voice alight with wonder. During her employ, Ruth’s bosses at Turner sent Ruth on a train trip to the East Coast, where she observed New England’s autumnal splendor and navigated glittering Manhattan.

The 21-year-old who Ray had married was not the 23-year-old to whom he returned. And obviously, the same was true of the battle-worn Ray. Together they told me candidly, as we strolled the boardwalk of Hollywood, Florida, around 1999, that had they not been bound by marriage, they would not have stayed together after the war. This honesty both impressed and devastated me. What a sad truth; what an honorable pair. And so Gramma’s loving nature never found a romantic outlet. The two were married for 67 years, until Grandpa’s death in 2010. Ruth visited him daily in the Memory Unit of their senior community — she was the only person who, through the lens of his dementia, Ray still could recognize. I remember encouraging Gramma to visit a little less and to live her own life a little more. She informed me that Grandpa was like a child and she couldn’t abandon him — “It isn’t nice, Laurel.” Yet, in an interview we conducted in 2012, Gramma couldn’t tell me the story of her “first love” – she had never fallen in love.

As a wife and stay-at-home mother during the late 1940’s, 1950’s, and 1960’s, Ruth kept house in Bud Long Woods, Highland Park, and Skokie (where she and Ray lived until 1991, at which time they sold their modest home and moved to a ranch-style townhouse in Buffalo Grove). Their first child, Barbara, was born in 1948; their second child, Richard, was born in 1952. Ruth kept their house spic-and-span — thoroughly scrubbing clothes, floors, and windows was probably her favorite aspect of housework. Cooking was probably her least favorite chore. Ruth’s mother was a gifted cook with a talent for “eyeballing” ingredient quantities and appetizingly seasoning dishes; Ruth doubted herself in the kitchen, never knowing how much of an ingredient qualified as “a pinch” and preferring her food bland. Ray’s job — both traveling door-to-door as well as managing operations at the Marcus Brush Company, the business he had inherited from his father — kept him away from home during the week and every Saturday. Sometimes on Sunday’s, the family would go for a drive. Ray’s absence was both a burden and a blessing since, temperamentally, Ruth and Ray were rarely in sync. Ruth was usually smiling and laughing, perennially upbeat and easily amused. Ray came off as distant or grouchy, perhaps put off even more than he would have been by the contrast between his own mood and his wife’s sunniness. He would retreat into crossword puzzles or yard work; at the kitchen table, he would imitate her giggles, dismiss her prattling with a wave of his hand and/or pronouncement of “Feh,” or boomingly intone, “You’re crazy, Ruth.”

Now one mustn’t think my grandpa was a monster, for he was far from it. Ray was a wounded survivor. As a young child, Ray’s mother Gussie told him that he had killed his baby brother by “loving him too much” (i.e., infecting the infant with a case of whooping cough). Gussie also suffered from the tragic loss of her parents, siblings, nieces and nephews in a raging apartment fire, which limited the extent to which Gussie could emotionally “be there” for the sensitive Ray. It’s doubtful that Ray found much comfort in the presence of his father Oscar, whose running around with their married neighbor Bea was an open secret. Immediately upon Gussie’s death in 1966, Oscar gave Bea almost all of Gussie’s possessions and promptly made her his wife. The choices that might have helped Ray find happiness — namely, career and marriage — were imposed upon him by sickness and war and, unfortunately, both ill fit the man who would emerge from the bloody conflict. Finally, Ray was bothered by his lack of high-quality schooling (which, by no means, was his fault and, in fact, indicated his honor). He would scorn his own intelligence at times, especially when we would talk of my own (hoity-toity, and enabled by his own labor and sacrifice) pursuit of multiple advanced degrees. He didn’t begrudge me my education; he was in awe of it, and judged himself harshly for barely getting any at all. It wasn’t easy being Ray. In his eulogy of his father, Ray’s son Dick stated, “The dementia that caused Dad to lose his strength, that robbed him of his talents and his wit, that caused him to even forget how to operate a fork and a spoon, that same awful dementia, also caused him to forget what he had been angry about all his life. In the end, Dad’s bitterness vanished like so much smoke.”

And that was the way it was.

In the late 1960’s, Sarah came to live with Ruth and Ray during the summers (she wintered in South Beach at the Carlyle Hotel). Sarah and Ruth were devoted to each other, despite Ruth’s perception of her own shortcomings, over which, Ruth believed, her mother despaired. Whereas Sarah had thick, curly locks, Ruth’s hair was always thin and somewhat wispy. “My mom always used to tell me, ‘Fluff it up, fluff it up!”” Ruth laughingly relates as she simultaneously recreates the gesture of hair fluffing. She routinely admires my thickish, curly hair and bemoans her own follicular fate. “If I had your hair…” she often says, and tells me how she cries over the few strands that she’s forced to sacrifice to her comb. Although nowhere near the same league as the hair issue, which reigns supreme as her number-one lamentation, Ruth also feels bad about her bust, whose size is more modest than her well-endowed mother’s had been. And finally, she rues her unadventurous palate, chuckling in retrospect at her misguided distaste for her mother’s flavorful cooking. Ruth’s self-identified limitations don’t end there. She claims to lack artistry, and so aesthetic endeavors like home decoration completely befuddle her. “I hold the pencil like this,” Ruth often says, demonstrating a shaking grip, to explain her fear of and lack of talent for writing. Among the well-educated and/or well-traveled (certainly well-monied) residents of the senior community in which she has resided since the mid-2000’s, Ruth humbly occupies a “less than” position. I’ve been led to believe, the only thing she brags about is her amazing children and grandchildren — never herself.

Certainly Ray’s years of belittling did nothing to build up Ruth’s confidence. But why was her sense of worthiness, at least in these enumerated areas, low in the first place? Why did she believe that the volume of her hair mattered a bit, let alone so very much? A small bust was made fashionable by icons like Audrey Hepburn, and certainly it matched my gramma’s slim figure. So what was the problem? And who cared if she liked spicy food or unspicy food? That’s no sign of valor. My grandpa had an ulcer for much of his life, so bland food happened to be perfect for his purposes. How limiting was it, I wonder, for her to believe she lacked any talent for creativity? Why did Gramma keep herself in that box?

Ruth actually loved music and movies and books. She ceaselessly listens to the radio, keeping up with the news or humming and dancing around the kitchen. When my mom went back to college, Ruth took a Piano Appreciation class but did not keep up with it for very long— somehow, she became unconvinced her talent. Maybe teacher told her that she’d never be a virtuoso…? But what did that matter? She was a middle-aged housewife, not gunning for Orchestra Hall. Gramma stopped taking those piano lessons and returned to the workforce, serving as the secretary to a head honcho at Sears’s new store in Northbrook Court. She left this job when she felt that she needed to care for her elderly mother. But throughout the decades, and up until quite recently, Ruth would cheerily plunk away at the keys of her upright piano (except for the brief time during the 1990’s when Gramma generously lent her piano to me, so that I might study the instrument (which I never truly did)). Music was beloved, and always a part of her.

Ruth loved stories. She went to the cinema year-round and at whatever time of day she pleased, regardless of whether the movie had already started. She would remain in the theater until she’d seen every part of the film, be it from beginning to end or from middle to middle. She told us conventional grandkids that this habit was a throwback from her younger days, when moviegoers would always get a newsreel and a cartoon, etc, for their nickel’s admission. Ruth loves black-and-white films and, since she never used to sleep much, getting the Turner Classic Movie channel via cable totally changed her life for the better. Gramma has always enjoyed reading too, even maintaining Grandpa’s subscription to the Library of Congress’s “book-on-tape” program for the visually impaired long after he lacked the capacity to attend to its tales, and even after Grandpa passed away. All of this suggests a feeling for art if I ever saw one.

And is there any finer or more challenging a practice than the art of conversation? Ruth can and does talk with everybody. My uncle, her son Dick, told me with reverence that his mother retains the stories of CEO’s and chambermaids, and holds them all (both the stories and their tellers) in equal esteem. Never will you meet a more personable and joyous old lady, made all the more charming for her advancement in years. She laughs and smiles, touches busboys on the forearm, pats random children on the head, and sees people. Domestics are not invisible to Ruth — she greets them as easily and as regularly as her aged neighbors. She knows the names of her waiters’ children, and the doctor son of the woman at the bank (who she used to visit often since Ruth insists on giving the grandkids “a few bucks” every time she sees us). The employees at The Corner Bakery start cooking her scrambled eggs (which aren’t even on the menu) as soon as they lay eyes on Gramma, and the staff at Georgie V’s whip up her regular order (and my mom’s and my uncle’s) within moments of her settling down in a booth. Whenever I identify myself to the front desk staff at Gramma’s building as Ruth Marcus’s granddaughter, their knowing and appreciative “Oh” informs me that Gramma is special to them too.

Gramma twinkles. Her joie de vivre is exceptional, unflagging, infectious. She gives everyone the benefit of the doubt and describes most people as “dear” — except for those who embattle the lives of her loved ones. “Don’t let ‘em push you around,” Ruth habitually tells us grandchildren, the youngest of whom is 25 years old. “Tell ‘em your gramma will get ‘em,” she instructs. We all agree: No we won’t; yes we will. “Keep the faith, baby,” Gramma also tells us. And she thanks us for calling, with a genuineness and humility that could break your heart. “Of course, Gramma,” we say.

She tells me that I’m special, so special, and everyone who surrounds me, particularly my fiancé, better know that. He knows, I assure her. “There’s no one in the whole world like Laurel,” she tells me, and won’t hear any protestations to the contrary, will not accept that among my contemporaries, I’m only maybe above average. “If you knew what it was like to live life like the rest of us…” she tells me. For the past few years, at the end of every phone conversation, I tell her I love her. She used to laugh at this, I think because such a sentiment is obvious and such words are inadequate for expressing the magnitude of our feeling. She would tell me, “I love you more,” and I would permit her this one-up. But now she tells me first, “I love you” or replies, “I love you too.” Maybe this is an indication of her complete assimilation — I once read a book entitled I Love You’s Are For White People. Or maybe Gramma knows that, at any time, this might be her last chance to let me know, unmistakably, how she feels. We know; we both know. But we still say it.

My great-grandmother Sarah passed away when I was one year old, so I never really knew her. I know she was an incredibly strong woman, and I know that my gramma still adores her, still misses her. I try not to begrudge Sarah for the hang-ups that her daughter acquired and retained throughout her life; the times were different, and so were parenting philosophies. I know that Sarah did her best. Consistently since 1981, Gramma has visited with her dear, departed mother. Sarah appears in Gramma’s dreams; they often sit side-by-side on a bench facing the ocean in Florida. They chat. It gives me immeasurable comfort that soon, Gramma will be with her mother.

I also gladly comfort in the fact that Sarah will fetch Ruth and shepherd her to the other side. After all, Gramma’s family has a long, well-documented history of spirit-assisted crossing over.

One evening during the late 1970’s, Sarah found herself alone in South Beach, without a phone, and feeling quite poorly. Certain that she would die that night, Sarah laid out various paraphernalia on her dresser so that whoever discovered her body would be able to identify her and call her daughter Ruth. When she went to sleep, she dreamed. She was seated at a dining table with her husband Harry (d. 1959) and son Maury (d. 1961). When the men finally got up to go, Sarah rose to join them. “No,” they told her. “It isn’t your time yet.” Sarah awoke the next day feeling much better, and later visited a doctor. He contended that Sarah had suffered a minor heart attack yet recovered.

By February 1, 1982, Sarah had been living full-time with Ruth and Ray for quite a while. She awoke that morning and informed Gramma, my mom, and anyone who would listen that her deceased husband Harry was coming for her. Sarah dedicated that day to saying her goodbyes, even driving out to Glenview with Ruth to bid farewell to Barbara (and baby Laurel). Before going to sleep that evening, she walked slow through the house, looking, looking, looking for Harry. Everyone dismissed her behavior as dementia — after all, the 90-year-old Sarah had wandered off recently and been unable to find her way home. Once, Sarah had convinced herself that Ruth was her landlady, and this landlady was licentiously sleeping with some strange man (who, in fact, was Ray). Sarah refused to speak to Ruth for an entire day — “You know what you did!” she had told my blameless “strumpet” grandmother. But on this day in February, it seems that Sarah was lucid. In the dead of the night, Sarah arose from her bed and, without the aid of her glasses, dentures, or walker, she made her way through the dark house, descended the stairs, undid the multiple deadbolts on the front door, and experienced a massive heart attack before falling dead upon the snowy lawn.

In 1988, my mom feared for her life; a malady from which she was suffering might be a brain tumor, and she was on pins and needles waiting for the results. During that time, she had a dream. Her grandmother Sarah, her grandmother Gussie, and her uncle Maury appeared at her bedside and told her that it wasn’t her time yet. Indeed, my mom was cancer-free.

In the 1990’s, Sarah’s youngest sister Ethel was facing her final days. Ruth and Ray would attend to her during the day, while a nurse would accompany her overnight. My grandpa told me that she used to cry out in her sleep, “No Maury, I’m not ready yet!” He explained that Ethel’s financial affairs were not in order. With an accountant, Ray helped to settle Ethel’s estate. And when the task was completed, Ethel awoke one morning and announced that Maury was coming for her. She went to bed that night and neither did she stir nor ever wake up.

A few weeks ago, my mom had a dream. In the dream, she was at the grocery store with her Uncle Art, Ray’s older brother. He assured her, “Everything will be okay.”

It seems that my gramma believes this too. When a hospice social worker asked Ruth last week if she understood what was going on, Ruth said yes. “I’ve had a good, long life,” she said. “And nobody lives forever.” Yesterday, she abruptly awoke from a nap and told my cousin Joe, “I’ve still got some time left.” But the end is nigh. Today, after Ruth woke up, my mom asked if she had been dreaming. “Of course!” Ruth laughingly replied. I think that Gramma was dreaming of her mother, in fact was with her mother, on that bench outside the Carlyle Hotel.

Tonight I sat with my gramma. She’s faded, and fading, and oh-so-skinny, but the words she can muster definitively prove that she’s still herself. We’re blessed by that fact; my grandpa was dead years before he died. When I announced my arrival over Gramma’s bedside, she smiled happily and accepted my kisses. Later in the evening, when I asked her if she’d ever seen Meet John Doe, the Barbara Stanwyck-Gary Cooper movie we were all watching on the TV in her bedroom, Gramma murmured, “It sounds so familiar…”

We left Gramma in the care of Elizabeth, her sweet night nurse, and promised to return for breakfast. “Okay,” Gramma agreed. I believe we’ll reunite in the morning. But maybe we won’t.

“I’ve had a good life,” Ruth said. According to developmental psychologist Erik Erikson, the imperative that people face in their life’s final chapter is Integrity vs. Despair. Either they make peace with the life they have lived, with the way things have gone and the legacy they leave behind, or they bitterly wonder, “Is that all I get? What was it for?”

If I could, I would have eased my grandpa’s burdens, which perhaps would have made him a happier man and a better mate for my gramma, the one into whose arms she might have fallen, lovestruck. I would have helped my gramma to believe in her own specialness and revel in her beauty, both outer and inner. But Ruth herself admits few, if any, regrets. She has said that, had she known how much she would enjoy her grandkids, she would have had more children. I know that she would have loved to have lived part of her later life amid the hustle and bustle of downtown… But overall, she’s made peace; she’s prepared; she’s peaceful.

“I’ve had a good life.”

I’ll be with my gramma until the end. And I know that she’ll be with me afterwards.

Love, Josephine-style

To honor Valentine’s Day and again trot out one of my most beloved essays from ye olde blogge of yore, I share this inspirational and TRUE story…

What Would Josephine Do?

(originally published online 10/01/07)

Josephine was one big dating “don’t.”

She pushed too hard. She clung too tight. She regularly chewed her anus.

Josephine was a bitch – literally. 100% female dog.

If you don’t count the carnival fish or science class hermit crabs, Josephine was my only pet, the lone animal to capture my heart. Worms captured her heart, but that’s another story.

When it comes to matters of the heart, Josephine actually had a lot to teach. I didn’t appreciate this at the time, but now that I’m older and infinitely wiser, I can see Josephine for what she really was:

A love goddess.

It’s true. Don’t be fooled by the fact that she used to snarf her own turds – nothing more than a crafty ruse to throw us off-track.

Clever girl.

Josephine educated by example, both negative and positive.

NEGATIVE: Josephine used to bully us into giving up physical affection. She’d whine. She’d squeal. She’d bash me with her head, applying snout-as-lever force in order to send my hand arcing through the air and landing limply atop her head. Oh, how I’d dread her approach. Oh, how I’d bruise like a peach.

What’s the lesson in all of this? First, keep your elbows above muzzle level and always protect your extremities. Second, violence is no way to win love.

Today, when I find myself yearning for creature comfort (and know a non-blood relation who might consider giving it), Josephine’s teachings form the cornerstone of my strategy. I sideline my “grabby snout.” I put myself in my (hypothetical) boyfriend’s shoes by reflecting on what I would have appreciated: A reasonably worded rubdown request; a few upfront tit-for-tat pats. If Josephine had treated me with respect, I would’ve happily scratched behind her ears, and felt like a sweetheart instead of a servant.

POSITIVE: Josephine’s loyalty was limitless. True, her protective instincts could err on the side of excess. For example, there was the time that Josephine scared the neighbor’s dog so profoundly, it channeled its agitation by popping one of its eyeballs from the socket. The eyeball dangled free for a couple of hours, but that’s not the point.

The point is, if you look past that unfortunate incident, you’ll glimpse a lifetime of steadfast devotion.

Here’s the lesson: Get your crew’s back and show ’em some love. In this era of multi-tasking and compartmentalizing, time and love are increasingly rare. Basic supply and demand, my friends —being rare makes them valuable. So don’t skip out on the socializing or skimp on the sentiment. Josephine never did.

During her later years, arthritis in her hips made stair-climbing difficult. Dad built her a ramp, complete with carpet squares and wooden braces. During her later years, incontinence made bladder control impossible. Dad built her a dog house, complete with supplementary space heater. Josephine never used the ramp, though, and she never ventured into the dog house. Why?

“Because she was dumb” would’ve been my answer several years ago. But now that I’ve uncovered Josephine’s love goddess identity, I’ve changed my tune. Maybe she rejected the ramp because she was eager to accompany us and the ramp would’ve slowed her down. Maybe she bypassed the dog house because she wanted to watch us and the dog house would’ve limited her vision.

Or maybe she was dumb.

Regardless, the lesson we can derive is still a valuable one: Love your loved ones, and then love ‘em some more.

It’s been five years since Josephine died. Gone are the fur clumps that used to choke the staircase cracks. Gone are the neon yellow stains she leaked onto my carpet and my carpet alone.

But the heart’s a funny thing. Every time I walk through my parents’ door, I still brace myself for Josephine, inwardly cringing as I anticipate her full-on knee-rush, paint-peeling breath blast, room-clearing fart gas…

For nothing. Because Josephine is gone.

So I hang up my jacket in the vacuum of eerie silence, breathe in the scent of antiseptic cleanliness, and am always, unaccountably, disappointed.

Now I’m on my own, looking for love in this brave new world. As I negotiate the perils of online and face-to-freak dating— trashing misspelled come-ons from middle-aged foreigners, meeting up with bleary-eyed belchers for a cup of 7-11 Big Brew—I find I’m at a loss. How should I act?, I wonder. What should I do?

That’s when I intone my trusty mantra: WWJD, What Would Josephine Do? And I act according to her enlightened example.

So maybe I am still “single” and without a “prospect” between “here” and “Kingdom Come.” But I swear, it’s not because of interpersonal incompetence. Thanks to the love goddess, my dating deeds are not one big “don’t.”

And someday, they’ll end in “I do.”

The Day Has Come

Yom Kippur begins tonight at sundown. This means that, for Jews, it’s time for us to reflect on our lives over the past year and, hopefully, wipe the slate clean and start fresh.

Three years ago, I found this poem/self-reflection tool that so eloquently invites us to think/act towards enriching ourselves and our lives. I share it because I care.

——————-

The day has come
To take an accounting of my life.

Have I dreamed of late
Of the person I want to be,
Of the changes I would make
In my daily habits,
In the way I am with others,
In the friendship I show companions,
Woman friends, man friends, my partner,
In the regard I show my father and mother,
Who brought me out of childhood?

I have remained enchained too often to less than what I am.
But the day has come to take an accounting of my life.

Have I renewed of late
My vision of the world I want to live in,
Of the changes I would make
In the way my friends are with each other
In the way we find out whom we love
The way we grow to educated people
The way in which the many kinds of needy people
Grope their way to justice?

I, who am my own kind of needy person, have been afraid of visions.
But the day has come to take accounting of my life.

Have I faced up of late
To the needs I really have –
Not for the comforts which shelter my unsureness
Not for honors which paper over my (really tawdry) self,
Not for handsome beauty in which my weakness masquerades,
Not for unattractiveness in which my strengths hide out –

I need to be loved.
Do I deserve to be?
I need to love another.
Can I commit my love?
Perhaps its object will be less than my visions
(And then I would be less)
Perhaps I am not brave enough
To find new vision
Through a real and breathing person.

I need to come in touch with my own power,
Not with titles,
Not possessions, money, high praise,
But with the power that it is mine
As a child of the Power that is the universe
To be a comfort, a source of honor,
Handsome and beautiful from the moment I awoke this morning
So strong
That I can risk the love of someone else
So sure
That I can risk to change the world
And know that even if it all comes crashing down
I shall survive it all—
Saddened a bit, shaken perhaps,
Not unvisited by tears
But my dreams shall not crash down
My visions not go glimmering.
So long as I have breath
I know I have the strength
To transform what I can be
To what I am.

The day has come
To take an accounting of my life.

Levy, R.D. (Ed.) (1985). On Wings of Awe: A Machzor for Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. Hillel Foundations. pp. 104-106.

Cooperation

Cooperation is neither the province of women nor an artifact of maturity; cooperation fuels all peoples and emerges from our earliest days.

Kohlberg’s stages of moral development (1958) position obedience as preceding negotiation; thus, cooperation cannot emerge until the capacity for a certain amount of cognitive complexity has been achieved. While Gilligan’s In a Different Voice (1982) illuminated several deficiencies in Kohlberg’s vision, it did so on the basis of gender bias. According to Gilligan, “They [women] developed in a way that focused on connections among people (rather than separation) and with an ethic of care for those people (rather than an ethic of justice)” (Huff, 2001).

Designating empathy and cooperativeness as expressions of subgroups rather than universal human traits, though, is incredibly problematic. First, just who or what are men and women anyway? I wonder how, if at all, Gilligan’s paradigm accommodates for socially-constructed gender vs. biologically-tied sex. What happens when these superficial distinctions break down, as in the case of butch females, drag queens, transsexuals, intersex individuals, etc? Second, how do the historical record and contemporary social structures support this theory of opposing, partisan priorities? While I tend to distrust biological determinism, human evolution and culture, broadly defined, suggest that all peoples value collaboration and connection. Similarly (and sadly), abuse can induce individuals from all walks of life to commit atrocities that tear those institutions asunder.

Dacher Keltner’s Born to Be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life (2009) argues that we are hard-wired to reach out and love someone:

“Jen science is based on its own microscopic observations of things not closely examined before. Most centrally, it is founded on the study of emotions such as compassion, gratitude, awe, embarrassment, and amusement, emotions that transpire between people, bringing the good in each other to completion. Jen science has examined new human languages under its microscope—movements of muscles in the face that signal devotion, patterns of touch that signal appreciation, playful tones of the voice that transform conflicts. It brings into focus new substances that we are made of, neurotransmitters as well as regions of our nervous system that promote trust, caring, devotion, forgiveness, and play. It reveals a new way of thinking about the evolution of human goodness, which requires revision of longstanding assumptions that we are solely wired to maximize desire, to compete, and to be vigilant to what is bad” (Keltner, 2009, para 3).

Along a similar vein, Richard Sennett’s Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation (2012) conceptualizes cooperation as a homegrown, human craft. Excitingly, he draws on developmentalist Erik Erikson and children’s gaming to strengthen his argument:

“Reflexive, self-critical thinking doesn’t imply withdrawal from other kids; children can be reflexive together. One piece of evidence Erikson provides for this process is game-playing. At the age of five to six, children begin to negotiate the rules for games, rather than, as at the age of two to three, take the rules as givens; the more negotiation occurs, the more strongly do children become bonded to one another in game-playing…

“Erikson’s sweeping point about this passage is that cooperation precedes individuation: cooperation is the foundation of human development, in that we learn how to be together before we learn how to stand apart. Erikson may seem to declare the obvious: we could not develop as individuals in isolation. Which means, though, that the very misunderstandings, separations, transitional objects and self-criticism which appear in the course of development are tests of how to relate to other people rather than how to hibernate; if the social bond is primary, its terms change up to the time children enter formal schooling” (Sennett, 2012)

Our mission, therefore, is to support the skills and spaces that facilitate development of the ties that bind. I’ll stop short of calling for hand-holding and Kumbayah-singing — but if you start the song, you know I’ll chime right in.

Eulogies

Ray & Ruth Marcus at the Felt home | Approximately 1983, celebrating their 40th wedding anniversary

These eulogies were given by my uncle, mother, and father at the May 10, 2010, memorial service for my grandfather, Raymond Marcus; he had died three days prior, just two weeks shy of his 89th birthday. It was unseasonably, bitterly cold that day — all the more reason for my siblings and cousins and me, gathered at the graveside, to huddle together. These stories were shared before we visited the cemetery, when first we gathered at Weinstein Funeral Home in Wilmette, IL.

Richard Marcus

Over the last week and a half I wrote, first one, and then a second eulogy, word for word. A day or so after I wrote each of them, I threw each one out. Those efforts just didn’t tell the story that I wanted to share. My dad, I have come to realize, was a complex man. I don’t know if I have the ability or the words to do him justice. I stayed up way late last night preparing this, and then couldn’t sleep knowing I still didn’t get it right. So even before I begin, I ask you, my family, my friends, to help me with this job, to speak about my dad with your stories and reminiscences, to fill in the gaps that I know I am leaving out.

I best get started with the easy part. My father wasn’t an especially large man. He stood no taller than me. But his frame was bigger. He had wide shoulders, a barrel chest, thick, hard arms, and remarkably strong hands. Dad’s typical day at Marcus Brush Company entailed both office chores and strenuous physical labor. After retirement, he became a gym rat. He and my mom took exercise classes for years. Dad lifted weights in the gym until he was 80 and walked three miles a day until he was 85. And in his last year, and actually until the final few days of his life, Dad insisted on taking a walk each morning through the long corridors of the Care Center — exercise and exertion were a part of Dad’s make-up that even his dementia couldn’t take away. As a result, for my entire life, I knew that Dad was strong and hard as nails.

But despite his own personal traits, Dad didn’t judge other men by their size, strength or toughness. My father taught me that “you don’t take the measure of a man by the size of his shoulders but by how he accepts and carries out responsibilities.” That was my dad’s code. That was how he lived his life and interpreted the world.

For seven summers, during my high school and college years, I worked alongside my father and grandfather, my uncle and my cousins Ken and Roger, at the Marcus Brush Company, the family business. To this day, I am grateful for those summers and for the opportunity to see the world that my dad operated in five or six times a week, a world that he would go to every week for 40 years. I saw how he interacted with his employees, his customers, his suppliers and all the characters in the neighborhood of 23rd and Canal.

I saw that Dad, while expecting his employees to put in a day’s work for a day’s pay, also believed in paying a fair day’s wage for that day’s work. I saw that my dad was a straight shooter. He said what he meant and meant what he said. If he made a commitment, he made every effort to fulfill it, and if he couldn’t, he didn’t make up excuses as to why.

But most of all, I came to understand just how hard my dad worked for the salary he earned. I came to understand the challenges and tensions, the set-backs and aggravations that a typical day in my father’s working life could hold.

And what was the motivation for the efforts I saw? My dad had few indulgences beyond a gym membership and a weekly massage. No, he worked for us. For Mom and Barb and I. He worked to provide a solid middle class life for his family. Barb and I were far from being spoiled, but we never lacked for any essentials and Dad never hesitated to pay for any reasonable extras. We may not have taken many fancy vacations but both my sister and I graduated from college with no debts — Dad paid our ways, my sister to Northwestern, me to the U of I and then on to law school. So, our family was blessed with a sense of financial security, but there was more to it than that. Dad didn’t work so hard to make his life easier; rather, to make our lives better.

Listen. Dad wasn’t a warm, Father Knows Best, “daddy” kind of guy -– far from that. Yet Barb and I grew up having no doubts that our father was devoted to us. He wanted us to be strong and happy and successful in whatever we attempted. And if he could help us somehow along the way, we knew Dad would try even without our asking. All our lives we knew this. And in a world that could be very mean, we knew we had our dad, and come hell or high water, we never had to stand alone. That knowledge, that feeling, has been a comfort. It has been empowering. What greater gift can a father give his family?

I know that I could exercise from now until doomsday and never have shoulders as broad as my dad’s. And I know that I’ll never be as tough as my father. But I also know this: If I always strive to be there for my family, for my wife and my children, if I endeavor to be honest and fair in all my dealings, if I accept and don’t hide from responsibilities, I will be honoring my father’s memory.

I should stop here, but I need to talk about a more difficult side of my dad. Bear with me though, and know there is a happy ending.

Dad was not easy-going. To be sure, Dad could be kind and insightful, funny and creative. But more typically, he was dark and blunt and grumpy. It seemed to me that Dad struggled to keep an anger that resided deep within him from bubbling to the surface. Most of the time, Dad was successful in that struggle. But not always. Bullying-types saw that Dad was not the sort of guy to try to snow or push around, they left him alone, and searched for softer targets. But some good people could be put off, and Dad sensed this and very much regretted it.

It follows that Dad was not a touchy-feely kind of guy. Giving hugs and kisses — even pats on the back — were not a part of his natural repertoire. When the situation called for such a sign of affection, Dad gave and received the requisite kiss or hug awkwardly, almost self-consciously.

I don’t know the basis for all this. I don’t know why Dad may have carried such anger. But I have my suspicions.

My dad actually had three brothers. Art and Bernie we all remember. But there was a third. Dad’s younger brother Leonard. When my dad was about four, Dad contracted whooping cough. And one day, while he was sick, Dad reached into the crib where his infant brother was laying and started to play with him. Dad was kissing one of Leonard’s hands when my grandmother walked into the room. Frightened by what she was seeing, Grandma screamed at Dad to keep away, yelling that he was going to kill the baby. Eventually Leonard did catch whooping cough. He choked to death one dreadful night. For years after, my grandmother explained that her infant son died because “Raymond loved him too much.”

My grandmother, who had not yet recovered from Leonard’s death, endured another tragedy — the death in an awful house fire of her mother and father and two younger brothers. So gruesome was the scene that after my grandfather went to identify the bodies, he actually suffered a breakdown and was unable to walk or to work for nearly a year. As for my grandmother, her strength was broken. She’d suffer from aches and illnesses the rest of her life. There was little energy available to tend to the emotional needs and concerns of Art and Ray, who were shocked and scared by the lives lost and by their parents’ sufferings.*

There were other instances that I just don’t have time to go into: my dad, a lefty, being forced at school to write and work right-handed; the problems with my grandparents’ marriage; my dad’s experiences in the war, to name a few. All — or none — may have colored my dad’s personality and stoked his anger.

But let me tell you about the last few weeks of my dad’s life. By then he had forgotten how to dress himself, how to feed himself, how to wash himself. Still, he never failed to recognize my mother. And after a visit, when my mom was set to say goodbye, Dad would reach around her and give her a hug and a kiss without hesitation or awkwardness. Dad willingly held my hand and didn’t scowl when an attendant kissed the top of his head. And just last week, he gave my sister and my niece a hug, with genuine emotion. Something had changed. And I know what it was. The dementia that caused Dad to lose his strength, that robbed him of his talents and his wit, that caused him to forget even how to operate a fork and a spoon, that same awful dementia, also caused him to forget what he had been angry about all his life. In the end, Dad’s bitterness vanished like so much smoke.

Later today, we are going to read the 23rd Psalm. There is that famous line about walking in the valley of the shadow of death. When we recite that, I want you to picture my dad traveling on that last leg of his journey, not only as a good man, not only as a man of duty and honor, but also as a happy man — walking with his back straight, his head held high, and feeling, finally, light as a feather.

*In fact, Ray’s beloved older brother, Art, narrowly escaped death by that same fire. That evening, he had gone to sleep over at his grandparents’ house but, seized by homesickness, decided that he didn’t wanted to stay the night. He called home and his father fetched him just hours before the fatal blaze. –Text added by Laurel Felt from recollection, written February 2, 2012


Barbara Marcus Felt

With gratitude to my children, who encouraged me…
The most outstanding feature that I remember about my dad is his hands. Even as his body diminished, his hands remained strong. He was ambidextrous and could equally use his right and left hand; his handiness was what helped him make sense of the world. When words failed him, he expressed his emotions with his hands.

When my brother was born, my dad – by himself – remodeled and refinished a room, basically making a nest for my brother. And when we moved into our house in Skokie, he created a home for us by building – by himself – this tool shed out back that actually looked like a little house, with windows and a window box. And when his words failed to communicate with my mom, he studied her and he sculpted her and he recreated her with his hands, carving a likeness of her out of driftwood.

My dad wasn’t handy in the sense that I’ve come to love about the Felts, and he wasn’t a hands-on dad. But he sculpted us into the family we are today. He was handy in the three-dimensional, way-of-knowing-about-the-world sense. And in the end, when there were no more words, I held his hands, and he was with me.


Richard Felt

Hello everyone. For those who may not know, I’m Rick, Ray’s son-in-law for almost 39 years.

I first met Ray Marcus about 40 years ago when his daughter Barbara, whom I was dating, decided it was time for her parents to meet “the dentist.” Ray liked to call me “the dentist” even though in those days I was still a dental student and not yet a real dentist. He used the term a little jokingly because he had just written the last of several large checks to the Marcus family dentist for goldwork on Barbara, and Ray was not too happy about the timing of “the dentist” arriving on the scene too late to have saved him a lot of money.

In the early years, Ray and I would jog together at the J in Skokie almost every week for a while. Ray was not blessed with terrific eyesight, so he shied away from most sports. But that man could RUN. I was not a good runner, so Ray would have to tone it down in order to keep things at my pace. He never failed to do so, even though I suspected that he considered our runs together to be just an appetizer.

I liked Ray right from the start, and I know he liked me as well. He was a nice guy, pure and simple. You always knew where you stood with Ray because he didn’t put on airs—and no B.S. He called it the way he saw it. In the early years of our marriage, Barbara and I moved to Appleton, WI. I started a new general dental practice there which was growing, we bought a nice home, we made friends, we joined a supportive synagogue, and we had a son, Benjy. Nonetheless, we decided to move back to Chicago after 3 years for a number of reasons. I know Ray missed having us close when we moved away to Appleton, and especially when his grandson was born, so you would think that he would have been overjoyed to hear that we were moving back. But Ray was concerned that we had accomplished much in a short period of time in Appleton, and that we would be giving up the security of those accomplishments if we moved back. He had grown up in periods of uncertainty during the Depression and WWII, when there was almost no security at times, and he had lived through the difficulties of starting a new business: the Marcus Brush Company. He advised us to think over carefully whether we should actually leave Appleton. So Ray was willing to give up something he really wanted—our return and more time with his new grandson—in order for us to benefit by maintaining the security he felt we had there in Appleton. It was an unselfish act on Ray’s part.

When I finished my specialty training and decided to open an office in Northbrook, Ray (and Ruth) were there for us again, this time with a checkbook. He lent us some money to get things off the ground. I wanted a written contract, with specified interest and a repayment schedule, like a real business transaction. But Ray looked at it as a transaction of love. He didn’t want any schedules or anything on paper, and told us to take as long as we needed to repay the loan. In my mind, I think he didn’t really want repayment at all, because when we did repay the loan, he was reluctant to accept our check for fear of causing us financial hardship. Ray was not about money—he was about love and family. Add to that a measure each of conscientiousness, responsibility, preparation, attention to detail, modesty, and humor, and you have a recipe for the man we knew and loved. We will miss you, Ray.